Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Beam
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Jason Beam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominate for deletion Can find nothing on Google or in article to prove WP:NOTABILITY. Has been tagged as of uncleaar notability for 4 years. Boleyn (talk) 19:34, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete Article is 4 years old and has zero references. Gut feel is that ability to establish wp:notability falls just short. North8000 (talk) 20:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I did find him listed in this book, but the coverage is insubstantial. -- Whpq (talk) 16:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.