Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasmin SMS Gateway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:09, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jasmin SMS Gateway

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet our notability guidelines. There's no significant coverage in reliable sources: note that references provided in the article to BBC News and The Guardian do not actually mention Jasmin. It gets some mentions in 'how-to' articles and in promotional articles on the web, but no significant coverage in anything I think we'd consider a reliable source. Previously {{prod}}ed by Ohnoitsjamie, endorsed by me, and contested by 190.246.131.119. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 11:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 13:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 13:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I also think it seems questionably solidly notable. WP:TNT at best. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteper nom fails WP:SIGCOV .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.