Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Calon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Calon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. WP:BLP of an inventor and businessman, which is (a) written more like a prosified résumé than an encyclopedia article, and (b) minimally sourced to one primary source directory of patent applications and two glancing namechecks of his existence in articles which aren't about him. As always, businessmen and inventors are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they can be nominally verified as existing -- he'd be eligible for one if he could be properly sourced over WP:GNG, but none of the sourcing here is helping him get there. Bearcat (talk) 00:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Bearcat put it beautifully. DrStrauss talk 12:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I did get 6 hits for him on Scholar, but all were mentions of the patent. Absolutely zero on News and Books, etc. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.