Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Green
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of Jericho characters. Stifle (talk) 15:49, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Jake Green (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Tagged for nearly a year as needing reliable third party sources. Consists entirely of plot summary with no evidence of notability independent of the series. McWomble (talk) 04:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 05:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 05:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge the important stuff from this article into List of Jericho characters. Somno (talk) 05:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cut down on unverified plot summary and merge into List of Jericho characters until enough is verified for a separate article. - Mgm|(talk) 11:00, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The discussion in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnston Green showed that the best solution was to merge all the other characters and leave the two protagonists to have their one article. I am ok if we merge since none seems to can find any real world information but certainly don't delete because we need the redirects. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:15, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but trim plot summary. See discussion under the Robert Hawkins AFD, above. 23skidoo (talk) 16:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep' or do a proper merge, that preserves the information. I have no real objection to a long list of characters, if the information is kept. At this point , the best way of ensuring that here seems to be having separate articles. I would however cut down on some of the plot details, DGG (talk) 19:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. And the reliable sources establishing notability of the character independent of the series are.....? McWomble (talk) 08:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.