Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jakarta Annotations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Jakarta EE. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 02:05, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jakarta Annotations

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is supported by 3 primary sources, all of which are documentation pages published by Jakarta EE. I didn't find reliable coverage on Google Scholar or Google News, though I did find several passing mentions. The article may also fail WP:NOT, as in, Wikipedia is not software documentation. Caleb Stanford (talk) 01:50, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:08, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jakarta EE - I found a bit of discussion under its older names (JSR 250, "Common Annotations for the Java Platform"), but not sufficient coverage to justify a standalone article. Cheers, Suriname0 (talk) 15:20, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Suriname0 (talk) 15:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jakarta EE. My WP:BEFORE search finds only references which are primary to the subject and not sufficient to establish notability. So, redirect as per viable WP:ATD. If secondary and independent references to the subject are found then please ping me. Fade258 (talk) 13:46, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jakarta EE Charlie (talk) 11:07, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jakarta EE since there are only the primary source from Jakarta, this does not need to stand alone, maybe a merge of this basic content as well. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:05, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.