Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jak and Daxter Collection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jak and Daxter. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 14:58, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jak and Daxter Collection

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the article may pass the WP:GNG, there is more in determining what is an appropiate article than that. This article was brought up at WT:VG and generally agreed upon that it should be redirected or deleted. It was done so and reverted before a SPP was requested and done because of reverting. Once the RPP came off, it was reverted. I went and redirected yesterday in line with the consensus at WT:VG and it was reverted with a rational of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS essentially. ∞陣内 Jinnai 16:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and protect. I posted a message on the creator's talkpage shortly before you AfDed this. I was hoping to talk some sense into him so he would understand why it can't be. Because it is a collection, it is held to a higher standard. It needs significant coverage in both development and reception which are exclusive to the collection, not the games inside of it. It is possible, but not at the moment as it is not even released yet. I told him to continue finding sources like he is doing, but in a sandbox in his userspace. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 17:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Blake. This is an HD remaster which can be covered in the Jak series page, much like the God of War Collections. It doesn't have enough distinguishing material to justify a separate page the same way that Ico + Shadow does. Axem Titanium (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this article. It is fine and does not need to be deleted. It's a good page giving information for people new to the series and planning on buying the collection, and more will be added after the game is released. This should stay put, because once the game is released, more sections will be added, including reception. (talk) 10:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That logic flies directly in the face of WP:CRYSTAL.∞陣内 Jinnai 02:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jak and Daxter. It is all redundant to the material in all the other articles. --MuZemike 01:19, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.