Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jais Chauhan
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:29, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Jais Chauhan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Claims made in article are not in any way verified by references. Does not appear to be 'blatant hoax, and references preclude WP:BLPPROD Shirt58 (talk) 10:07, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of any notability. I saw this as a new article and didn't tag for deletion hoping for improvement, but none has come. No evidence that he has actually done anything except failed an exam. Velella Velella Talk 13:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete should have been speedy deleted, there is no evidence of notability. --Muhandes (talk) 22:28, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hoax or genuine, fails WP:NACTOR any way--DBigXray 10:58, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.