Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jabberd14
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:54, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jabberd14 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software. No notability shown since its creation in 2005. SL93 (talk) 21:45, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 21:46, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Although I found some coverage in this book and a thesis, they're not enough to pass WP:SIGCOV. Other sources only make brief mentions, mostly in configuration files: [1], [2], [3], [4]. Heartmusic678 (talk) 16:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.