Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JCI Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:21, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

JCI Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nn PR spam. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buff bills 7701 22:06, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there are a couple of companies called "JCI Technologies", some of which have coverage in reliable sources (though not much). But none of them seem to be this "JCI Technologies" and almost all of the "sources" are dead-links. Without evidence of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, I can see how this could possibly pass WP:CORPDEPTH. St★lwart¹¹¹ 23:36, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 14:31, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as seems more promotional than anything. –Davey2010 • (talk) 21:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.