Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isn't It Romantic (2019 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:47, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't It Romantic (2019 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to film notability guidelines, an unreleased film that is in principal photography is only notable if the production itself is notable, that is, has been covered by independent sources. There is no mention of anything notable about the production. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:06, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NFF. A major studio film with production just began, it doesn't need to be deleted. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 05:48, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a notable topic. Search engine test turns up multiple results. Please do a search per WP:BEFORE before nominating an article for deletion. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 18:55, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (gonna snow here) as a film production shown by due diligence [1][2] to be receiving the coverage to meet WP:NFF. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 03:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There's evidence that it's started filming so meets WP:NFF. [[3]] [[4]] [[5]] Cowlibob (talk) 00:07, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.