Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic pantheism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:09, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic pantheism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources have been provided for over a year, since the article was tagged. The apparent sources given are two references that relate to pantheism generally as well as Wikipedia, Facebook and YouTube links (the last of which was removed by other editors). In particular there is a statement in the Background section, "the one piece of evidence we have is of an online group on a social networking site which openly voices that they are Islamic pantheists", suggesting that it is a un-notable topic for Wikipedia. Green Giant (talk) 01:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:42, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:43, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an unsourced original essay presenting a novel interpretation of philosophy. Carrite (talk) 02:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The term "Islamic pantheism" gets a handful of hits in not-very-prominent scholarly works (for example, M. J. Sahlani's "In the Name of God: Sufi’ism, a Transcendental Pantheism and the Mystery of Mysticism in Persian Poetry" and Muhammad al-Muhammady's "Iqbal and the Malay World"), but these are just isolated turns of phrase rather than an established concept, and certainly have nothing to do with a movement supposedly established in 2010. —Neil 12:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.