Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IslamicTorrents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:HEY. (non-admin closure) — fortunavelut luna 11:28, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IslamicTorrents

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Useful and used, but does not meet WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 18:50, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NWEB. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 21:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have found three reliable sources,have added them to the article and the subject meets WP:SIGCOV requirements. Note I am unable to use Google Books citation tool as the google books url is blacklisted, so you may have to search Google Books separately for mentions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikishagnik (talk • contribs) 16:40, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To assess the sources added
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 13:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per Wikishagnik - Ret.Prof (talk) 20:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.