Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iris Hauser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep - nominator withdrew. NAC Ajraddatz (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iris Hauser

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, fails WP:ARTIST IagoQnsi (talk) 17:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This article was created as a part of this meetup: Wikipedia:Meetup/Regina/ArtAndFeminism 2016/University of Regina. The meetup seems to have produced a lot of articles of questionable quality/notability -- nearly all of them either have been deleted or have ongoing AfDs. -IagoQnsi (talk) 17:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 18:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 18:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:40, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, basically, you are nominating articles created on an editathon for deletion and then are using these nomination as the reason for deletions? An innovative approach, to say the least. Perhaps you might stop for a minute and contemplate. --Oop (talk) 22:07, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Based on the sources appears to be a well-established artist. Gamaliel (talk) 15:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clear Keep well established via source, significant coverage alone hits threshold, Sadads (talk) 17:07, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Six of the ongoing AfDs referred to in the nomination: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Dalton, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Cole, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Levine, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marsha Kennedy, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Levine and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iris Hauser have been initiated by IagoQnsi. The event where an article was created is not in itself a valid criterion for deletion. That articles should be deleted because related articles have been also been nominated for deletion is also not a valid criterion; The AfD procedure for deleting multiple pages does not apply here, and should not be used as an argument. Mduvekot (talk) 17:12, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Mduvekot. I'm not trying to use the creation as an argument, and that's why I created each of these as separate AfDs rather than making one big AfD. I believed each of these articles individually failed to pass the notability test, and just thought it was worth mentioning that there was a common thread. -IagoQnsi (talk) 17:15, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I apologize, this AfD was a mistake -- I clearly misunderstood the criteria for artist notability. I move to keep and speedy close this discussion. -IagoQnsi (talk) 17:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:49, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.