Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invasion OS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invasion OS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable OS; search for reliable sources failed. 黒い白い (KuroiShiroi) 14:32, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response to 黒い白い (KuroiShiroi) - you haven't searched deep enough. The new version of OS is comming and article links are included in every release so people who download it could know more about it. This article should not be deleted. On the other hand, non-notable os is not an excuse to delete the article. 18:01, 2010.08.18 User:Dancing Raccoon. —Preceding undated comment added 15:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- Would be happy to withdraw if sources are provided. 黒い白い (KuroiShiroi) 15:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If the operating system was only released a month ago, it's good evidence that it isn't notable; and lack of notability is indeed a reason to delete the article. (See the notability guidelines.) Wikipedia is meant to be a compendium of existing knowledge, not a means to make something known. Delete. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:28, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just another Linux clone (openSuse) claiming to be for the average user (and most Linux clones claim to do this nowadays...). Dime a dozen. No sources, nothing on google, fails WP:GNG. Ryan Norton 20:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if it's that necessary, if it's THAT hard to keep it here, if it makes you jealous that someone can actualy do a Linux clones, then fine, delete it. One person might mean nothing, but the reputation of Wikipedia falls in front of my eyes :) Author of Article. 02:09, 2010.08.19 —Preceding undated comment added 23:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

It's too bad the reputation of Wikipedia falls in your view, perhaps you should start out by editing articles unrelated to your own work; you might end up changing your opinion. Wikipedia isn't a place for promoting stuff, its just an encyclopedia that also happens to be a wiki. There are plenty of other places you can discuss this new Linux clone, and maybe one day it will take off in some fashion, be historically notable, and thus have an article here. Ryan Norton 23:30, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. Nuujinn (talk) 10:57, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.