Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet (web browser)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Internet (web browser)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable mobile web browser which is accessible only in India. Independent sources just talk about launch of the application, but a burst of coverage (often around product announcements) does not automatically make a product notable per WP:NSOFT. I don't think it should have a dedicated article. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 16:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet, Software, and India. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 16:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It's got a full article in the Verge and the Hindustan Times, both solid sources. I'm not sure what the issue is. Oaktree b (talk) 21:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I looked at those and, as I said, a burst of coverage (often around product announcements) does not automatically make a product notable per WP:NSOFT. I think it really needs more than that to merit a standalone article, but we'll see what others say. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 21:26, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Ok the Verge is minimal, but a solid source. Here's TechCrunch [1] Oaktree b (talk) 21:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: coverage in The Verge, Hindustan Times and TechCrunch amounts to notability. Owen× ☎ 15:07, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - While it's understandably difficult to find sources for a browser simply called "Internet", I did find some reviews in addition to the above, including in Digital Trends. Some of them I found have a churnalism vibe to them or are sites that I'm not familiar enough with to say they're reliable, but I think what's been listed here so far does show enough notability per WP:GNG if nothing else. - Aoidh (talk) 03:34, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.