Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internalnet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Internalnet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has no citations, is a stub, and seems to fail WP:TOOSOON from what I can gather. External links appear to be mostly speculation. GrinningIodize (talk) 21:34, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology, Technology, and Computing. GrinningIodize (talk) 21:34, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No in-depth coverage found. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTDICT. Not seeing much hope to expand this beyond a stub definition.Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 01:15, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, could not find any coverage other than a super brief mention on one paper. Shocksingularity (talk) 21:45, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.