Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internal hardware
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per WP:G7. Fathoms Below (talk) 18:03, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Internal hardware (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Redundant with Computer hardware Gjs238 (talk) 13:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- … and written in bad English, and sourced to adverts and search engine magnets when there is a mountain of proper reference works on this stuff, and with the adverts/magnets even saying "computer hardware". I am not happy with a redirect simply because everything from spacecraft and helicopters to hot rod cars can have internal hardware, as it is simply just the component parts that are inside the casing of some machine or other. As a topic it lacks the word that would make it coherent, like "computer" for computer hardware. But we definitely do not need this content, which is an unnecessary fork by a poor title. Delete. Uncle G (talk) 15:40, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also agree with Uncle G that this should not be retained as a redirect. --Northernhenge (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Content is poor and I'm unconvinced that the term has any currency in order to justify keeping it as a redirect. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:10, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.