Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Web Business Laboratory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:53, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligent Web Business Laboratory

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Maybe there are better sources in Korean, but I'm not finding basically anything of any reliability in English. Was trimming the article originally for improper ELs, but it doesn't look like the problem of relying to heavily on primary sources is fixable at this time, because that's pretty much all there is, again, at least in English. TimothyJosephWood 16:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:18, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it's simply a lab, there's no substance here for actual independent notability and I see none of the needed improvements with it. SwisterTwister talk 02:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – After several source searches, I have only found one reliable source (link), but this only has a passing mention. Does not meet WP:N at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.