Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent Light (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 11:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligent Light (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails to meet the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 04:27, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:23, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability not established. And given that we are talking about a 25 year old piece of software I can't see that changing. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 23:05, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 01:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete I'm in a quandry about this. Because the software is so old, and because there's another company with the same name selling lighting products which trumps Google searches, finding reliable online sources seems to be pretty much impossible. However, there might well be offline (paper-based) sources for this, that nobody's going to be able to find within a week the AfD is going to run for, which seems a bit unfair. Still, if somebody turns up something later, the page can always be re-created as it has little content. --Ritchie333 (talk) 16:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.