Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IntITa
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- IntITa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be a non-notable school. A WP:BEFORE search only returned primary or self-published sources. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:39, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:39, 31 October 2021 (UTC) - Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:39, 31 October 2021 (UTC) - Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:39, 31 October 2021 (UTC) - Delete might just be one person's business? Also observed the user who created it Special:Contributions/Olha Prymak has not made any other edits in the following 7 years. W Nowicki (talk) 18:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.