Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instabase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator (WP:SKCRIT#1). (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 04:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Instabase (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot see how this can pass WP:NCORP. Any citations in RSs are routine announcements (fails WP:CORPDEPTH). Lack of WP:SIGCOV. Edwardx (talk) 19:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Meets WP:NCORP. Seems like it's one of the unicorn companies with high profile media coverage. The company does have independent in-depth coverage (please see below). WP:ASSERTN

Helloanant007 (talk) 18:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 06:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.