Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insight Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 19:57, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Insight Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this article satisfies WP:CORP or WP:GNG. There are two sources that cover an opening of a helpline in 2010, but none of them provide much more than that, and that's all I could find. Don't be confused with this Insight Foundation or this one Muhandes (talk) 19:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. (I was the one who contested an A7 on this, for what that's worth.) Good as the two sources are, only one is directly about the company - the Times of India article would support notability for its founder, but not for the foundation. One more source would be enough, but I can't find much beyond four passing mentions. Alzarian16 (talk) 19:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG.Stuartyeates (talk) 02:39, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter (lecture) 11:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:00, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Without coverages from periodicals, sufficient votes from everyone else, and anyone else improving this article, this article's topic has been proven to be non-notable. --Gh87 (talk) 01:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.