Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information Technology in Libraries
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 01:34, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Information Technology in Libraries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research, and redundant with a few different articles: History of writing, History of computing hardware, and Library science. The original version seems to be a school paper, but the original author removed most of the content after the article was proposed for deletion through WP:PROD. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:28, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is potential merit in having a specific entry, but as it is written this is a personal essay about the topic rather than an encyclopedic entry and would have to be completely re-written from scratch to begin to pass basic guidelines.Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:47, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I will try to persuade the ed. to contribute to our articles on the subject in a more useful fashion. DGG ( talk ) 01:17, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.