Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immobilized Enzyme Reactor System
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Rjd0060 (talk) 22:36, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Immobilized Enzyme Reactor System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references. Article seems to contain a lot of "big words" about a product, and in fact seems to feel like promotional material to me. -- Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 08:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Searching Google Scholar throws up quite a few references to the topic. Article should be improved not deleted. --Colapeninsula (talk) 08:51, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Colapeninsula. The only wording that seems anything vaguely resembling promotional material are two phrases about efficiency of the process: "a cost effective method", and "The economy and process efficiency of lactose hydrolysis in milk improved using this continuous flow bio-reactor" Anarchangel (talk) 12:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 14:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep per Colapeninsula's argument above. I'll strike the "weak" if someone can actually post links to these useful references and/or insert them into the article. As it stands, I don't like it, and it needs cleanup, but it's in the category of "probably notable." - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 19:14, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.