Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilves Framework

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ilves Framework

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources or indication of notability for this software. PROD removed without comment. —Swpb^talk 21:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 22:38, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added entry to the CMS software list for an OS web framework I have been developing which required article as well. The inclusion criteria related to this kind of software entries is a bit vague but there is certainly question about notability. For professional software developers new / emerging frameworks are of great interest and hence I saw inclusion in the list as valid at least. I hope there is time to give it a fair assessment. If it is not found adequate for a spot in the list and/or stub article then I understand the removal. I would like to point out that the instructions in PROD clearly stated that it can be removed without comments. My intention was not be offensive but I thought I took one of the accepted actions after deletion proposal. —Tommi Laukkanen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.157.53.169 (talk) 05:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a prod tag without offering a rationale is technically allowed, but self-evidently unhelpful. And no, the inclusion criteria are not vague; like every other article, notability must be established by meaningful coverage in secondary, reliable sources, of which this article has zero (probably because none exist). —Swpb^talk 13:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unable to find wp:RS - at best this is wp:TOOSOON Neonchameleon (talk) 16:26, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent refs. A search turned up no reliable source coverage of this software.Dialectric (talk) 12:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.