Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikonboard (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Kurykh (talk) 21:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Ikonboard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Official website no longer exists and no new releases have been made in over a decade. (Original nomination for deletion was back in 2010.) Brollachan (talk) 10:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:09, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:09, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No reliable third party source to assert notability. Mohammad Sally (talk) 06:00, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:01, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Strong keep: not a single valid argument for deletion has been asserted, per WP:NOTTEMPORARY and Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup. (There are plenty of links at the bottom of the article for satisfying WP:GNG; the fact that they are currently languishing there is irrelevant.) I should also note that this software is of not-insignificant importance to the history of the web in general due to its relationship to Invision Power Board, among the most-used Internet forum software (and later content management systems) on the Internet. Mdrnpndr (talk) 22:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.