Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Igor Radusinovic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 01:52, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Igor Radusinovic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Havent played in any professional league. Failed WP:GNG. Could be notable though in February if he plays for Barito in the Indonesia Super League. MbahGondrong (talk) 22:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 23:36, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 23:36, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete. In february he will played. And now he is notable! PSBaritoManiakk (talk) 10:00, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article can be recreated if and when he makes his debut, but until then, speculation as to potential future appearances is never grounds for notability. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:21, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless, no reliable source can be found to show that he meets the notability requirements for his own article. — Jkudlick tcs 05:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.