Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignition Consulting Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ignition Consulting Group

I have found no reliable third party sources that have more than trivial coverage of this company. The COI author asserted that it met our guidelines stating the following on the talk page:

This entry is notable because of the extensive and distinctive work Ignition Consulting Group has done for developing a value-based compensation model for advertising agencies and their clients. Coke is one of the first major companies to begin adopting such a model and have recently cited Tim Williams as one of the leaders in the value-based compensation movement (cited in a recent industry event and webinar hosted by the American Association of Advertising Agencies). This is big news to have a major company like Coke finally adopting the value-based compensation model.
Ignition Consulting Group along with Tim Williams has been cited and interviewed on the topic of value-based compensation quite extensively as it is big philosophy change in compensation structures for advertising agencies and their clients.
I have included references of papers, studies and interviews on this topic in this entry. If there are specific changes I need to make to make this entry more Wikipedia friendly please let me know. Thank you.

Unfortunately, the sources added appear either not independent or trivial in nature.

I have found some indication that Tim Williams is notable in his own right, however, so I am open to this content being moved into a larger article about him. ThaddeusB (talk) 03:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- ThaddeusB (talk) 03:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- ThaddeusB (talk) 03:13, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. An AFDbot notified me...and since I think I deleted previous versions, and placed an initial CSD notification I think it fails to reach the bar for inclusion. Syrthiss (talk) 15:06, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: self-promotion. Alexius08 (talk) 03:49, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above.Tyrenon (talk) 10:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.