Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IText
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn. Stifle (talk) 08:14, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- IText (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
All references are to the software's own website. Notability not established. Stifle (talk) 13:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 14:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I think the fact that a book has been written about this library (mentioned in the section "Books and Articles") is enough to establish notability of this library. — Tobias Bergemann (talk) 14:13, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep per Tobias; nomination was made based on inaccurate grounds & there have been no other calls to delete this. --Karnesky (talk) 14:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep Used by a lot of programmers, one of very few usable free pdf libraries.--Oneiros (talk) 14:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Tobias - book establishes notability. Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 16:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.