Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IOS 8
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 18:05, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- IOS 8 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTCRYSTAL TheChampionMan1234 09:01, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. TheChampionMan1234 09:02, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- keep I added a prod earlier, but considering how many independent writing there are on the topic from the big writers about Apple topics, there is certainly enough to make this notable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:22, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to iOS, I would say Delete per TOOSOON but I have a feeling this'll only get recreated again ... →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 16:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep, well referenced what it will be, a short stub (without rampant speculation) is appropriate. Prodego talk 19:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Though it a bit too soon. iOS 8 is upcoming and this article has some good sources to back up text. ///EuroCarGT 19:32, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete and recreate We should wait. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.91.109.5 (talk) 03:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Keep There is substantial coverage in reliable sources (just google "ios 8" in quotes), establishing adequate notability of the topic. While it's short enough that it could also be contained within iOS, it meets notability criteria, it could be expanded to warrant a split already, and it seems likely it will expand significantly within a month anyway. If it's still a stub in a few months, coverage options can be re-evaluated then. Agyle (talk) 18:33, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.