Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMPACT Laboratory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IMPACT Laboratory

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a lab group s the University of Southern California which does not indicate why it is notable. The article does not have independent sourcing to establish notability, and I cannot find any indication it is a notable lab. Whpq (talk) 20:09, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete T-LAB is another article about a lab group of the same university, this time without any sources except its own webpage. Both articles fail WP:ORG. If independent reliable sources can be found for these labs (self-published sources do not count), they might be merged into University of Southern California. Nimuaq (talk) 20:37, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I had a look at T-LAB and I agree that it is just as problematic so I've sent that to AFD as well. -- Whpq (talk) 14:26, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect to University of Southern California, perhaps add a line [[University of Southern California#Faculty_and_research|here about the USC Aerospace program and/or labs. tedder (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, without a redirect to the USC article. Not that notable, and an unlikely search term. --MelanieN (talk) 00:30, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.