Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IKASI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Speedily deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) WP:A7 and WP:G11. (non-admin closure) Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:41, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IKASI

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company lacks significant coverage from multiple reliable sources both on pages in a WP:BEFORE search and thus does not pass WP:NCORP. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:46, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 August 10. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:04, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 01:05, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk: Handy History Handbook Barkeep49 -- Thanks for your commentary. I realize this is a very small company that hasn't been featured in mainstream press clippings. Nevertheless, the company exists, does close to $10 million dollars annually, and is listed and described in detail at the various sources provided. These are not subjective sources. They are entirely objective listings of active companies. Anything resembling advertising has been stripped. The company is involved in cutting-edge work that IS very germaine to a highly-visible development that will change all of our lives very shortly: AI, or machine learning. It is not difficult to imagine future researchers combing through articles here and elsewhere to see when/where/why learning and probabilistic algorithms began to spread rapidly across the commercial arena in the early 21st century. All I'm trying to do here is to signal the company's existence and its area of expertise. I'm happy to change anything necessary. Thanks for your time! Handy History Handbook

@Handy History Handbook: I don't really doubt that it exists or does 10 million annually. However, Wikipedia has decided not every company gets an article. This page talks about which companies get an article, and it does require mainstream press clippings which is why I nominated it for deletion. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:31, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk: Handy History Handbook Barkeep49 -- Thanks for the response. I understand. I'll keep working on finding clippings to support any future entry if this one doesn't stand up. Thanks!

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The page had already been speedy deleted once by User:Cullen328 but the page was swiftly recreated https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=IKASI. Recommending salting as well. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:29, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tyw7: G4 doesn't apply because it wasn't deleted after an AfD. I see you've also tagged it A7 and G11. No comment on those. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What tag would apply for re-creation of deleted articles? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:35, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tyw7: G4 is the right tag. However it requires that an article was deleted via a community discussion. If it was deleted with a speedy deletion process (or PROD) it is not eligible for G4. If you have further questions about this, I suggest we do it at your talk page or mine as it's off topic to this AfD Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained more in depth on my talk page, but as Barkeep said, G4 will only apply if it is "recreation of material deleted via discussion." However, if an article is speedy deleted and recreated, and the original criteria for speedy deletion still apply, you can tag it for speedy deletion with those criteria.--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 14:54, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, preferably speedy delete. Doesn't pass WP:NCORP. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 14:56, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I've carefully examined each of the sources, as well as searched for more sources, and it doesn't look like any of them are reliable, independent, and significantly cover the topic, so this doesn't pass WP:GNG. WP:NCORP is similar to the general notability guideline, except with some extra criteria that would make companies notable if they apply, and none of these criteria seem to apply either.--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 15:01, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The content of the page looks about the same, so original CSD critieria applies. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:17, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.