Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFCAR Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:26, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IFCAR Solutions

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not meeting NCORP; no reliable sources; Cinder painter (talk) 12:32, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Morocco. Shellwood (talk) 12:57, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - Was close to tagging it for G11, but don't think it quite qualifies. Should be an easy delete since the page creator was blocked for promotion. Jdcomix (talk) 14:48, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Close to G11, Please salt the title after deleting, fails GNG and NCORP. GrabUp - Talk 16:01, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A recruitment firm going about its business but no evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:24, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It should have G11'd. No reedeeming features. Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creep^Talk 18:52, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NCORP. I cannot find sufficient coverage. Drushrush (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.