Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 10:08, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ICity

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potentially non notable building, sources are potentially a bit sketchy regarding the name of the skyscrapers, previously deleted page, failing to see what is notable about the skyscrapers.   Kadzi   (talk) 14:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.   Kadzi   (talk) 14:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Kadzi: So why, for instance, these stub articles about German stations Dresden-Pieschen and Dresden Bischofsplatz by a no name architect are notable without any independent sources and iCity skyscraper in Moscow by famous German architect Helmut Jahn at the cost of 350 million US bucks is not notable?--Александр Мотин (talk) 15:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

because I didn’t write those articles and have begun a discussion here on this one; to which other members of Wikipedia will add to until a conclusion is reached. Thank you.   Kadzi   (talk) 15:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Kadzi: You didn't say why a skyscraper by a famous German architect is not notable. Thank you.--Александр Мотин (talk) 15:11, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's irrelevant as to whether they're notable or not in the context of this discussion,@Александр Мотин:, if you feel they are not notable feel free to start a deletion discussion around them, otherwise you're just employing WP:WHATABOUTX.

Weak keep – there's an ok amount of coverage in Russian-language sources such as TASS, although a lot of it cleaves a bit too close to just quoting press releases published elsewhere. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. ~~Merging content to Moscow International Business Center, where the towers are located, is another option.~~ _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a part of MIBC.--Александр Мотин (talk) 00:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah my mistake, I see now that it says that it will be situated across from the MIBC. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:15, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:18, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:25, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.