Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBM Office and Document Processing System
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to IBM OfficeVision#Earlier ODPS in Far East. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:04, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- IBM Office and Document Processing System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. WP:N, WP:GNG etc. Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 21:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Merge anything that can be verified to IBM OfficeVision, the successor product. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 13:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- Selective Merge to IBM_OfficeVision#Earlier_ODPS_in_Far_East, where the product is discussed. This was a real product and the very basics seem verifiable in in RS. The suggestion by 86.17.222.157 is a good one--merge the verfiable bits into the OfficeVision article per WP:PRESERVE and to place the software in better context of subsequent developments. --Mark viking (talk) 19:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.