Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Austin (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:48, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hugo Austin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the general notability guideline. Two of the sources are from a licensed TV affiliate, and are not sufficiently independent to verify notability. The other sources merely verify his existence. The general notability guideline calls for significant coverage, where "sources address the subject directly in detail" and they should offer "more than a trivial mention". Shooterwalker (talk) 22:10, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nomination. The fictional character, as a subject, does not meet the general notability guideline since there aren't reliable third-party sources independent of the subject that cover the character in detail with critical commentary or real-world context. Jfgslo (talk) 22:55, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - insufficient secondary coverage. --Anthem 20:44, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.