Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hongwei Li
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (nomination withdrawn). ―Susmuffin Talk 13:21, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hongwei Li (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was created by User:Hongwei0921, who is almost certainly the subject of this article. Almost all of the Google search results are for different people by the same name. Furthermore, this article was nominated for speedy deletion twice; its creator removed the tags. If the subject is indeed notable, then it would be best if we started over. ―Susmuffin Talk 23:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:55, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:55, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 06:26, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep this is a pretty clear keep as, for starters, he is in multiple museum collections. For example the Art Institute of Chicago has some of his work. When I see collection(s), I generally figure they are notable as it is hard to get into collections. Also, we have a policy to the same effect (WP:ARTIST 4)d). After the collections, I look around for sources. I see a profile interview in Scultpure magazine. So he meets WP:ARTIST. The fact that he might have edited the article himself can be corrected through the use of the delete key on any non-encylopedic text.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 07:09, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.