Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HighGrow
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 23:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- HighGrow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable independent sources. The1337gamer (talk) 20:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 20:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 20:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 22:20, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete There appears to have been a proposed deletion ten years ago that was contested. But no notability evidence supplied in that decade! Claiming something was "popularized" clearly would need some source to quantify the claim. W Nowicki (talk) 19:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.