Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High-resolution high-definition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:16, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

High-resolution high-definition

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely no sources, fails WP:GNG, seems to be entirely original research 🤷 ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:22, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Technology, and Internet. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:22, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unfortunately: I agree with the OP. This article currently lacks any references, and seeing as the original edit dates back to 2005, I would assume it has lacked references and been a stub for the past 20 years. A brief Google search also doesn't return much in the way of references (<5), so unfortunately for this reason I think the only logical outcome is for the article to be deleted (or redirected if that's even necessary). 11WB (talk) 13:54, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.