Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helicon Photo Safe
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:34, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Helicon Photo Safe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage. Non-notable software. SL93 (talk) 22:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 22:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:21, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: I found a decent article in BetaNews but that was really it. As it's only one source, it doesn't meet WP:GNG. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 22:33, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.