Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hehe language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW, confusing vandalism was removed and sources added. Lenticel ^(talk) 01:09, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe language

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has no references to language. Semms like a joke Mjs1991 (talk) 13:59, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It seemed like a joke thanks to some halfwit at "Girls' Day School Trust". Here it is at Ethnologue. With an estimated 805,000 speakers just six years ago, does it still seem like a joke? -- Hoary (talk) 14:19, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, obviously. --Lambiam 14:52, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I added a ref. Definitely a real language. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:56, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, no reason to be here, real language, properly referenced stub. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:31, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - Real language, and good references are in the article.--Stv Fetterly (Edits) 17:44, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, obviously. --JorisvS (talk) 18:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball keep. I can see how one would think this to be a joke with the vandalism and the fact that "Hehe" is an onomatopoeia for laughter in the English language, but references have been added to verify that this is indeed not a hoax. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:10, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Non-vandalised version is notable. Buggie111 (talk) 00:08, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.