Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heaps Good.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm surprised this wasn't G11'd. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:04, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heaps Good.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No established notability, poorly sourced, discussed two unrelated topics and reads as promotional. Of the sources provided, one doesn't discuss the topic at all (it only mentions the slang term itself), two are from the same newspaper and give very cursory treatment to the subject, and the last one is a one-liner mentioning that the slogan might have been used in some sort of localised campaign. TechnoSymbiosis (talk) 00:07, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This is probably borderline notable, but when we don't have SA Great yet, I'm not expecting this to be kept. Mark Hurd (talk) 12:49, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's just a ad, however the ad could be changed into article however its not notable enough Ray-Rays 20:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymond88824 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.