Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Have Fun Teaching (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Already deleted. BD2412 T 21:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Have Fun Teaching

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Have Fun Teaching
• Articles for deletion/Have Fun Teaching (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Have Fun Teaching (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Overly promotional press release that fails to show the WP:SIGCOV required by WP:NCORP. Only coverage I am seeing is some coverage of their product, but no direct reporting or coverage on the company itself. Sulfurboy (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Delete The nom correctly asserts the promotional nature of the article. While that's strictly an argument to avoid, this is almost certainly undisclosed paid editing, and that's against the terms of use. The nom has also correctly called the failure to reach the basic notability guidelines at WP:NCORP, lacking as the article does any indication of the topic having received broad coverage in third-party, independent reliable sources. And a WP:BEFORE search indicates a further dearth of such in both the relevant literature and news outlets. ——SN54129 17:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as per g4. There's no point in rehashing this blatant spam again. Praxidicae (talk) 17:52, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.