Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HarvardScience

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HarvardScience

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this was a notable website during its existence. No secondary sourcing to be found. StarM 01:21, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. StarM 01:21, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. StarM 01:21, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. StarM 01:21, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the precursor to harvard catalyst, very much an internal website of limited broader interest. PainProf (talk) 02:19, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. A run-of-the-mill site. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unexceptional website, written about in an unpleasantly hyped way, with no indications of widespread influence. XOR'easter (talk) 17:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of significant independant coverage. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.