Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Singleton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 23:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Singleton

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ATHLETE. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 08:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator per consensus Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 23:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 08:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - There is no association football/soccer criteria so I'm rather confused why you would cite that. This is a person from the 1900s whose career ended in 1907, so are you aware that there may not be abundance of sources online for a person whose career ended 116 years ago?--Echetus Xe 10:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ATHLETE is related to football as well, am I missing something? I mean there is a section "Professional sports people" with various sports and football is not included, but that only means that we can't use some specific criteria for football to prove notability like in other sports. Thus, we should orient on WP:SPORTBASIC, which is not met in this case. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 11:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 12:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep There are sources online, [1], [2], [3] seriously, didn't you do a WP:BEFORE at all?? Govvy (talk) 21:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.