Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harmon Leon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:04, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Harmon Leon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a problematic article that has no citations and a complete lack of notability. It was only reinstated after an initial suggest for deletion due to the subject contesting that it was still valid on the grounds of it having been around for five years. The fact that it has been around in this state for so long and the fact that the subject had to resuscitate it would all lead credence to the argument that it is not notable and continues to be an unverified, personal page for one writer in San Francisco of which there are thousands of equal status. Allowing this article to stay sets the precedent for countless others to be created. Primecoordinator (talk) 03:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC) Primecoordinator (talk) 04:45, 07 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - marginal figure on the fringes of a number of fields, never quite meets the standards of actual notability. -Orange Mike | Talk 03:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article was deleted on 27 April 2011 via the WP:Proposed deletion process, where the article went seven days with a proposed deletion tag on it without objections. After the deletion, an objection was raised on 28 April, and a request was filed at WP:Requests for undeletion. As the article was not subject to speedy deletion, I restored it. That said, the request for undeletion did come from Harmonleon (talk · contribs), so I agree with Primecoordinator's assessment that the subject of the article made the request. —C.Fred (talk) 05:00, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:42, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:42, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.