Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hagit Ben-Yaakov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hagit Ben-Yaakov

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Coverage is routine rather than indepth with her as the subject. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 22:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 22:45, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - I recall that we tend to keep career diplomats' articles at the highest levels. This one is marginal because the coverage is pro forma. Bearian (talk) 14:34, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I recall we only keep diplomat articles if there is evidence of significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 22:58, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - couldn't find significant coverage in reliable sources except for in New Eastern Europe Mujinga (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No, we don't reflexively keep career diplomats' articles "at the highest levels" — we keep diplomats' articles if they're shown to pass WP:GNG on their sourceability, and don't keep them if they aren't. This one isn't, however: two of the three footnotes are primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, and the only one that comes from a real GNG-worthy media outlet just briefly namechecks her existence as the last eight words of an article whose primary subject is somebody else. That's not even close to good enough. Bearcat (talk) 16:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.