Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HVLAN
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- HVLAN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is uncited since creation (2007} or "citations needed" (since 2013). Corporate astroturf: article written by employee of company making supposed IEEE proposal, which seems to have never materialized. — sbb (talk) 23:26, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Well, whatever this was, there are no sources in Gbooks or Scholar, so the lack of sourcing doesn't help. There is nothing for notability, no sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 00:40, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: without sources. Nothing came up on Google. RolandSimon (talk) 02:38, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per Oaktree b‘s and sbb‘s search work and resulting negative results. —A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 02:41, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete unsourced this long unsure how this was AfD'ed and deleted sooner. Iljhgtn (talk) 18:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.