Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HELIOSPHERA (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 16:02, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HELIOSPHERA

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very (though not totally) unreferenced article about company, even though it's been around for months. Doesn't seem to have a lot of verification on weasel-laden claims to notability. I dream of horses (T) @ 06:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Snowball keep A previous AfD established notability and notability is permanent. The current poor state of the article is a reason for cleanup, not deletion. Dricherby (talk) 10:58, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep – The topic passes WP:GNG, having received significant coverage in independent third-party reliable sources:

Maykuth, Andrew (September 25, 2011). "From sunny forecast to dark clouds: The city solar project that didn't happen". The Inquirer. Retrieved May 31, 2012.
Tom Cheyney (December 1, 2009). "HelioSphera to build $500 million, 160MW solar PV module plant in Philadelphia Navy Yard complex". Photovoltaics International (Journal). Retrieved 2011-11-30. {{cite news}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
(in Greek) "HelioSphera: Technological excellence at European level". ΗΜΕΡΗΣΙΑ. December 17, 2011. Retrieved May 31, 2012.
Peter Key (November 30, 2009). "HelioSphera solar panel plant in Phila. expected to create 400 jobs". Philadelphia Business Journal. Accessed May 2011.
Key, Peter (December 3, 2009). "HelioSphera picks Philadelphia for solar panel plant". Business Courier (Cincinnati). Retrieved May 31, 2012.

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:25, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Snowball Keep This AfD should not have been opened because the subject's notability is not in question. And Adoil Descended (talk) 00:12, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.