Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H.I.R.D Music group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:32, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

H.I.R.D Music group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An earlier version of this page at H.I.R.D. Music Group was speedy deleted under WP:CSD#A7. In this iteration, there is a very slight claim to fame, thus this AfD rather than speedy deletion. I can find no sources attesting to the notability of this company. Does it exist? Yes. Notable? No. The sources extant on the article are to a youtube music video, a blog, a music fan site written by 2 people with an Alexa rank in excess of 2 million, and lastly a site with an Alexa rank in excess of 600,000 where there is precisely one sentence about Andrew Grant (founder of this company) but no mention of the company. The minor claim to fame here, of getting to #4 on Hype Machine ...which is a blog aggregator... I can not verify though I have tried. None of the people/groups which have released music through this company are apparently notable either. Looking at the Facebook page for the company; it has 15 followers. This organization hasn't drawn notable attention within the music industry. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Lastly, it appears the person who wrote the article has a direct conflict of interest, and despite being warned about COI issues continues to edit in support of his company. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable at this time and a clear conflict of interest Atlantic306 (talk) 17:01, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:32, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:32, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:32, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Theroadislong (talk) 13:55, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.